Sauron's map of Middle-Earth
I've been reading The Lord of the Rings to my son, and the other day we were speculating on the question, what if Frodo had failed? What if Sauron had regained the ring? We looked at the map of Middle-Earth in the book, and one of my first thoughts was, imagine how different this map would look if evil had been victorious?
It occurred to me that Sauron, or at least his generals and commanders, must have maps of Middle-Earth, too. What do their maps look like? How do they view the lands that we know as Gondor, Rohan, Rivendell, the Shire...? I've always loved Tolkien's maps, and I wonder if he ever speculated on this, too, or attempted to draw a map of his world from evil's perspective.
One thing seems certain, that just as in a capitalist oligarchy of the kind that's prevalent in our world now, a victory for Mordor would mean that everything on the map would immediately be reduced to its economic significance. What resources would each conquered territory bring to the devouring imperial machine?
So I took an existing map of Middle-Earth and made a quick, rough draft of how it might look if Mordor ruled all. If I find some time I might draw a map of Sauron's Middle-earth from scratch, with more detail, to explore this idea.
"This is a dream, you know."
I posted a
while ago about lucid dreaming. After I’d had a few lucid dreams it occurred to
me: I could be a writer not only during waking hours, but also practice my
craft while I sleep. If, while dreaming, I could become conscious of the fact
that I was dreaming, then I could shape and direct my dreams as stories. I could let a plot develop,
and try different variations of it. I could invent characters and not just
write about them, but talk to them, get to know them as if they were real
people.
This grand
plan to work as a writer both day and night turned out to be more difficult
than I’d anticipated. For one thing, first you’ve got to dream lucidly, and
that’s not easy to do at all, let alone on a regular basis. At least for me. Most nights my brain is just too tired from a
day of activity and doesn’t seem to want to be alert and inquisitive during dreaming.
It just wants to drift along with the dream and let it happen. I discovered
this in a surprising way one night when I was dreaming that I was back in grade school, which was odd in itself, but didn't make me aware I was dreaming. Then a woman came up to me
and said, “This is a dream, you know.”
I should’ve become lucid at that moment. Here was a figment of my own
subconscious inviting me to realize that I was dreaming! But I didn’t respond
to the invitation. I just nodded to the woman and sat down at my desk, and then the dream drifted on to other scenes. I was simply too far
“under” to care one way or another. Like someone sitting half-narcotized in front of
a television, my "conscious" mind just wanted to be spoon-fed and let the dream-story go where it
would. Sad to think how many people live their waking lives this way, let alone their dreaming lives.
The other
surprising thing I discovered about lucid dreaming is that trying to control
the dream doesn’t really work all that well. Unplanned events and surprises pop up no matter
how much one tries to stick to a particular story. In fact, the best thing about
lucid dreaming for a writer, it seems to me, is that the uncontrolled,
uncontrollable aspect of the mind, the “wild” mind, can add elements to your
dream-stories that you likely never would have come up with in the waking state. It’s
as if you have a collaborator, a mysterious other writer within you who comes
up with strange and wonderful ideas you almost feel you shouldn’t take credit
for.
[Image from Tarkovsky's Stalker. ]
Plotto
When I heard
about this book I just had to get a copy. Plotto
is the work of William Wallace Cook (1867 - 1933), a prolific churner-out
of pulp novels in many genres. He was quoted as saying, “A writer is neither
better nor worse than any other man who happens to be in trade. He is a
manufacturer.” To prove his point, he created Plotto in the 1920’s, a book that aimed to help a writer generate
every conceivable plot for a story, built around three essential elements:
protagonist, conflict situation, and resolution. You start with an initial
situation, and then let the book’s organization guide you through various
possible plot twists and outcomes.
Despite its
dismayingly complex-looking system of letters and numbers, the book was a huge
success, and has now been reprinted in a lovely new edition by TinHouse Books
of Orgeon. Can one still use Plotto
to come up with a workable plot for a story or novel? Yes, you probably can, but
one thing you quickly become aware of when using the book is that it’s also a
time machine: following its combinatorial logic takes you back to the attitudes
and mores of the time it was written, where “A” is always a male protagonist,
often struggling to succeed in order to win the love of “B,” the female
protagonist, whose stern father objects because “A” is poor... etc. It’s a
plot-world of maiden aunts and avenging wrongs and surprise inheritances and
the transgression of stratified social classes. It's an entertaining and illuminating book just to browse through, to see what was thought of as a "good story" back then.
Someone ought
to try updating the book to the 21st century. What you’d still end
up with, of course, is a catalogue for selecting prefabricated, formulaic plots.
Once upon a shell
In the course on storytelling I taught this year, I challenged the students to combine text with some other medium in order to tell a story in a new or unusual way.
The students responded with a wonderful burst of creativity. They put together photo essays, did spoken word performances, created a participatory storytelling game.... One student turned the classroom into a museum, complete with interactive exhibits.
Another student developed his own imaginary script, based on the fanciful notion that squid communicate by way of the shapes they can make with their ink in the water. And as if that wasn't enough, he honed his understanding and facility with script-making by copying out passages from various texts in various scripts (Hebrew, Arabic, English, etc) on the shells of eggs.
Maybe this is what happens when you teach chickens to read...
I hope these pics convey something of the painstaking effort that went into this project.
Eggquisite work, isn't it? He really went ova-board with this project.
Popular Posts from the Past: Five Questions
The other day I was looking through one of my writing notebooks and I was struck by how many questions there were in it. There was at least one curly little ? on almost every single page, and on some pages there were many. Questions about the plot, about what the characters should do next, about other ways the story might go, about why I’m writing this thing and what I’m trying to say.
It occurred to me then, looking at all
those pesky interrogative marks scattered like tiny thumbscrews across
the pages, how utterly vital questions are to any creative endeavour.
How they’re always quietly (or annoyingly) driving the work forward,
prompting one to ponder, delve, rethink, push a little harder, venture
out of the comfort zone, change course …
So I decided it might be a worthwhile
exercise to choose the five most useful, recurring, indispensable
questions that come up for me again and again during the writing
process. Limiting myself to only five was part of the creative challenge
of the exercise.
Rather than tenets or rules to live by, these then are my top five questions to create by:
Why?
What if…?
What else?
What’s going on right now?
Really?
WHY?
With the exception of scientists and
three-year-olds, most of us probably don’t ask enough “why” questions in
a day. If you’ve ever been driven nuts by a kid who keeps repeating
that pesky monosyllable after every “final” answer, you’ve felt the
power of Why?
No wonder Why? annoys
us: it forces us to do something our easily-distracted squirrel minds
would rather avoid: to keep thinking. It’s the question that drives us
on beyond our unexamined assumptions and easy certainties. Why? is how I find out who my characters are and what they’re likely to do.
While you’re at it, try
asking some of the people in your life a “why” question more often. Not
as a complaint or a rebuke, just to see what they think about something a
little deeper than what needs to go on this week’s grocery list. (Have
you ever noticed how rarely adults ask one another Why? unless they’re angry?)
Why? can burrow beneath the superficial skin of daily life and reveals the hidden or forgotten depths in those you think you know, including yourself.
Why? can burrow beneath the superficial skin of daily life and reveals the hidden or forgotten depths in those you think you know, including yourself.
WHAT IF…?
“What if trees had eyes?” my son
wondered the other day as we were walking to the park. That kicked my
sluggish mind into gear, as “what if” questions always do. It’s fitting
that we were on our way to a playground at the time, because that’s
what What if? does: it turns the real world into an infinite
playground for the imagination. It’s the world’s cheapest and most
effective de-aging solution.
Okay, I’ll play: what if trees did
have eyes? Eyes but no mouths or arms, so they could watch whatever was
going on around them but be unable to do anything about it. Would a
lumberjack see terror in a Douglas fir’s baby blues as he approached
with his chainsaw? Or maybe trees really do have eyes. After all,
they’re photosensitive beings: they take in light through every leaf,
and use it to grow. What if we thought of a tree’s leaves as its “eyes”?
Hey, there may be a metaphor here, or a haiku:
summer sun at noon
with every single leaf
the elm tree looks up.
... or maybe even the seed of a whole story. Thanks, son.
summer sun at noon
with every single leaf
the elm tree looks up.
... or maybe even the seed of a whole story. Thanks, son.
WHAT ELSE?
Related to “what if” is the less
well-known but equally powerful “what else?” The discoveries and
connections I’ll make in a day, the deepening of what’s already on the
page, will come about thanks to the mental nudging of “what else” and
its refusal to be satisfied with the easy plot device or the
pre-packaged solution. “What else,” to me, can mean many things. What
else is going on in this scene? What else does the reader need to know
to make sense of this? What else do these words imply? What else do I
have to say? Maybe nothing, but I won’t know for sure if I don’t ask.
WHAT’S GOING ON RIGHT NOW?
This question can propel me in two
different directions: both deeper into the work and out of it, back into
the unwritten world. Both are important for writing. Whenever either I
or the work-in-progress seem to have lost focus, that’s the time to
pause and ask what’s really happening at this very moment.
In terms of the writing, it’s a way of
regrounding myself in the sensory, the immediate, the palpable urgencies
of whatever place or situation my characters are in here and now. The
question compels me to step inside the story and look around, to see,
touch, hear, taste and smell this imaginary world I’m building out of
words. And doing that reengages me with the story and the beings in it,
and often shows me the way to go forward, from right now into the very next thing that should happen.
But “What’s going on right
now?” is also useful in one’s own life outside the page. I think a lot
of people never finish (or begin) that novel they’ve always planned to
write because they can’t stay put long enough in right now. It’s
where everything happens, of course, but most of us avoid it whenever
possible: it’s much easier to live in the past or dream of the great
work we’re going to do tomorrow, yes, definitely tomorrow, because today
we just don’t feel like it...
There are times, of course,
when it is best to let the work sit for a while and do something else
(for five minutes, an hour, a day, a year…?). And asking myself what’s
going on right now can help me understand when that’s the right thing to
do. The question regrounds me in my own here and now, reminding me that
the flesh is mortal and one can only accomplish so much in a day. So
get up and stretch, the dog is whining to be let out, go play with the
kids, take your long-suffering spouse to dinner at a fancy restaurant.
The miraculous thing is that while you’re doing that, your mind will
still be working, dreaming, forging unexpected links and taking
audacious leaps across synapses, and then, just when you’ve completely
forgotten about that problem you sweated over for hours, the answer
comes, as if out of nowhere. (When really it comes from all the stuff
going on inside you that’s not accessible to the prefrontal cortex.
You’re not in control of everything, you know).
REALLY?
This one is the wet rag, the snarky
teenager, the sober second opinion. “Cast a cold eye on life, on death,”
Yeats said, and it’s good advice for anyone riding the exhilarating
windhorse of creativity. He could have added, “cast a cold eye on your
deathless creations, too.” That’s what Really? is for. I’m sure
I’ve just penned the most magnificent pages the world will ever have the
great fortune to read, but the next morning, once the high has worn
off, I had better take another look. Once you’ve won the Booker you will
never need to doubt your own brilliance again, but until then…
Still, like the other four, this is a
dangerous question. It can easily be overused or asked at the wrong
stage in the creative process, since it comes from the Critic-Within,
that jaded gremlin who will choke off one’s imaginative flow if given
too much time and power over the work.
And like “What’s going on
right now?”, the cold eye of “Really?” can be usefully turned on the
unwritten world too, and cast at every glossy sales pitch, every last
word on the subject, every politician who spins us a golden tale of
better days ahead. And once we’ve asked it, we might find ourselves
returning full circle to that other question that comes in handy
whenever we’re told, by ourselves or others, That’s Just the Way Things
Are:
Why?
One more thing: don’t forget to
say thanks once in a while. To God, or the muse, or the right cerebral
cortex of the human brain, or whatever mystical or biological source you
believe your great ideas ultimately come from. No one creates anything
in a vacuum. Whether there’s an Author behind it all or not, it seems
pretty clear to me that this universe is an unfinished, always
astonishing act of creativity. Just look at a lilac bush, or a giraffe.
The universe came up with stars, galaxies, planets, life, and then it
really got going and dreamed up a being that could create universes
inside its own head, share them with others, and change the way things
are. That’s creativity, and it’s in everyone, and belongs to everyone,
so here’s one more question:
What are you doing with it?
A Journey to Both Poles At the Same Time
(part of a story told
to me over coffee one day)
“… So before they knocked me out to put the screws in my ankle, I felt some part of me, my awareness or conscious mind, leaving my body. I was able to float up to a corner of the emergency room and look around at everything, even my own body lying there on the stretcher, with all the blood and everything.
It wasn’t scary really; it
seemed perfectly natural. I thought, Oh,
man, I’ve become one of those New Age nutflakes you see on paranormal reality
TV. After a while, though, it was like I was able to see even further than
the room. My sight went out into the streets of the city, into the hills, up
the rivers past towns and villages, into the high mountains, into put it but I
felt like everything was aware, everything was conscious all around me and within me. Even rocks and clouds and
stuff like that. Like I could read the mind
of all living things.
Then I got scared, but I was excited too. Exhilarated. I
thought, now I’m going to get an answer to one of my biggest questions. You
see, I’d always felt there was some deep hidden meaning to the fact that the
poles of our universe are inaccessible. I don’t mean the north and south poles
of the planet, I mean the poles of the large and of the small in our universe. The
extremely vast and the extremely tiny. I call them poles because we’re like the
explorers of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, so desperately trying to
reach these untrodden places and claim them as our own.
Looking up, we can see
no end to the cosmos. Our instruments can’t reach the pole of the vast and probably
they never will. And looking within, we can only get so far in our measurements
of the tiniest components of matter. We don’t even really know what they are. So the pole of the vanishingly
small is also out of reach. Why should it be like that? That’s what I always
wondered, ever since I was a teenager and I watched scientists like Carl Sagan
on television. Why are we precisely here,
on this perceptual equator, you might say, poised midway between the infinite
and the infinitesimal? Anyhow, in that moment before the anesthetic took me under, I felt as if all I had to do
was exert a little more effort and I would be able to touch both poles, the
vast and the small.
I would see and understand the design, if there was one, the
purpose behind the inaccessibility that drives us on, keeps us searching, the
purpose behind everything. I would understand everything in nature, or maybe I
would be everything in nature. Every
creature, every rock, every molecule, every galaxy. Every particle of matter
and energy. I would no longer know, I would simply be, or it would simply be. Suddenly I was terrified. Absolutely terrified.
If I made that final effort, I knew it would annihilate the person I had always
been. Over and gone. Gone where? Who knows.
But still I could not tear myself
away. I was toppling over the edge. It wasn’t even a matter of my own effort
anymore, it was simply going to happen. I was going to be standing at both
poles at the same time, and maybe, maybe they were actually one and the same
place…. Well, as it happened, sleepytime kicked in and solved the dilemma for me.
I went under, and woke up a couple of hours later, groggy and extremely
thirsty, but sane, at least relatively. I told myself it was just a
hallucination brought on by the drugs in my system, and maybe that’s the truth
of it, but still it was … unforgettable. And okay maybe it’s silly, but you
know, sometimes I like to pride myself on having gone farther, deeper, than anyone -- Magellan,
Marco Polo, Newton, Scott, Amundsen, Armstrong -- has ever gone.”
Hamlet dies?
I haven’t blogged in over a week because my Mac failed and
it took me a while to get it fixed. One day it just wouldn’t start -- all I got
was the Grey Screen of Indeterminacy. Eventually the problem was solved -- a
cable inside the machine had failed and was easily replaced. But in the
meantime I got sick, and that, combined with no computer, kept me from writing
anything -- or feeling like writing anything -- for this blog.
So now I’ve got the Mac back and I’m feeling better, too, but
after almost two weeks with no blogging I discover I’ve gotten out of the habit
and I have no ideas, no inspiration. I’m sitting at the table yesterday evening
with a blank word document staring me in the face, and my son comes home from
his job at a restaurant and I say, “Conor, I need an idea for a blog post. You
got anything?”
He thinks it over, and says, “You should blog about how no
one reads books anymore.”
“I can’t blog about that,” I say, “because it isn’t true.
People still read books. Maybe more books than ever now.”
That gets him started on his English class. They’ve been
studying Hamlet. He hates the play.
Absolutely hates it.
“There must be a reason why it’s the most famous play in the
history of English literature,” I say. “There must be something you liked about it.”
He ponders that. He liked Horatio’s line “Good night, sweet
prince,” but only because John Goodman’s character quotes it in the movie The Big Lebowski, so now he knows where
the line originally came from.
Anything else? He mulls it over and his face brightens and he says he likes the fact
that the play has flaws in it. He grew up believing Hamlet is this GREAT work he should be in awe of, and it was a surprise to discover that there are some really dumb things in it.
Like the fact that Hamlet doesn’t do anything
for half the play, even though he believes his uncle killed his father, and
then when he suddenly decides to act, he kills the wrong guy, stabbing Polonius
through the arras. I agree with him. It’s not a perfect play, whatever a
perfect play might be.
Conor goes on to talk about reading the play out loud in
class, and how half the students can’t even pronounce the words that are still
current in English, let alone the Elizabethan words they’ve never seen before.
It’s painful, he says, to listen to them stumble over their lines. And then
there were the two girls who missed a class and asked Conor to tell them what
happened at the end of the play. He told them the ending and they were shocked.
“Hamlet dies? But he’s the hero.”
There’s something almost hopeful about that kind of
ignorance. To not know how the most famous play in the English language ends. So
that you can discover it for yourself, with no preconceptions. Which means that it still
has the power to shock and captivate readers.
I remember when I first read Hamlet in high school. I didn’t much care for it either. The language was just so
hard. A few years later I read it again, for a university class, and I heard something I
recognized in Hamlet’s speeches, something familiar and close to home despite
the antiquated language. I heard someone speaking of doubt and indecision and
pointlessness. Someone who didn’t know what his place was in the world, or why
he was here at all, or what he should do with his life. The voice of someone
who could have lived in my own time. Someone who could be me.